Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
61. WCS and scrambler suggestion - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I think this is the best suggestion so far regarding WCS.
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.03.10 17:50:00
|
62. WC Penalty - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Lorth So explain to me, why fitting more jammers, is a equal penelty to fitting stabs? One uses cap, takes a mid (more important for pvp) carries an aggression timer, has a limited range, requires a BS to fitt a short range ...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.03.10 06:44:00
|
63. THIS IS BLOODY RETARDED END IT NOW CCP - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
This thread deserves a sticky
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.03.10 05:40:00
|
64. THIS IS BLOODY RETARDED END IT NOW CCP - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Fi T'Zeh The count is so far : 23 poor souls (one of whom managed twice) The hall of shame is as follows - Ralitage Boyter Reto Denga vulture Shai Faetal VanDam CB Cyrix Death Unleashed Tar Magen GeeÆKin Dark Pine PoÆ Cha...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.03.08 12:59:00
|
65. THIS IS BLOODY RETARDED END IT NOW CCP - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
A ship wearing 1 or more hardener is imo not setup for combat. If you are in a combatship and you set it up with 1 or more hardener, that tells me alot about the faith you have in both your ship, your skills and in your wreckingcrew that should ge...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.03.08 08:56:00
|
66. WC Penalty - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: DigitalCommunist You think this argument started.. when? Just now.. when the OP created this thread? NEWSFLASH: This "subject of much whining" was created the moment WCS were introduced into the game. Of course you might k...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.03.07 18:31:00
|
67. WC Penalty - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Dark PIne Edited by: Dark PIne on 07/03/2006 08:14:55 How about something like this: 1) Apply stacking penalties to WCS: 2xWCS -> -1.9 scrambling strength, 3xWCS -> -2.x scrambling strength etc. 2) Add a falloff ...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.03.07 08:18:00
|
68. WC Penalty - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Dark PIne on 07/03/2006 08:14:55 How about something like this: 1) Apply stacking penalties to WCS: 2xWCS -> -1.9 scrambling strength, 3xWCS -> -2.x scrambling strength etc. 2) Add a falloff (2,5/5km) to scramblers: the scra...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.03.07 08:06:00
|
69. WC Penalty - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
IMO WCS and scramblers should both be changed to high slots.
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.03.05 09:28:00
|
70. Nosferatu nerf? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ok, so you have come from this: Originally by: Maya Rkell Nos have ABSOLUTELY ZERO opportunity cost on a close range BS. There has been absolutely NO argument made in this thread to refuse that, and indeed your post SUPPORTS that argument,...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.02.17 07:17:00
|
71. Nosferatu nerf? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Maya Rkell Dark PIne, no, for there to be no opportunity cost, it justs need to be even very marginally better, as long as it is marginally better in every situation. For a close range setup, this is entirely true. And I mad...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.02.16 16:03:00
|
72. Nosferatu nerf? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Maya Rkell Nos have ABSOLUTELY ZERO opportunity cost on a close range BS. There has been absolutely NO argument made in this thread to refuse that, and indeed your post SUPPORTS that argument, strongly. I found this defi...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.02.16 09:16:00
|
73. POLL: If heavy NOS is nerfed, will you still use a battleship in PvP? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Gronsak just nerfing nos wount stop anyone from ever useing bS, that is retarded, but it would stop people useing BS in certain situations. for example, id probably use a hac insted of a BS vs a group of frigs if nos where ...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.02.15 18:17:00
|
74. POLL: If heavy NOS is nerfed, will you still use a battleship in PvP? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Out of 29 posts to this thread, only 9 posters have given an aswer to the question. Current poll status: Yes, I still would use a bs in PvP: 5 No, I would not use a bs in PvP: 4
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.02.15 17:23:00
|
75. POLL: If heavy NOS is nerfed, will you still use a battleship in PvP? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
There are plenty of threads to discuss about the need of nerfing NOS, but this thread is not one of them. Please do not hijack this thread. I'm only trying to form a picture of how many pilots would switch their battleship to a smaller ship for P...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.02.15 15:54:00
|
76. POLL: If heavy NOS is nerfed, will you still use a battleship in PvP? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Thanks for your replies, but so far I can see only two posters actually answering the question. Poll status: Yes, I still would use a bs in PvP: 2 No, I would not use a bs in PvP: 1
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.02.15 15:46:00
|
77. POLL: If heavy NOS is nerfed, will you still use a battleship in PvP? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I have to say, I'd switch to use T2 frigates in PvP if heavy NOS was nerfed against smaller ships with sig radius or tracking.
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.02.15 15:27:00
|
78. Nosferatu nerf? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Mr Bright Idea: a gun smaller than its intended target gets a damage reduction. lets face it: A small gun is not desgined to punch through the thick armour of a BS. So lets give them a fat 50*% damage reduction vs BS and 25%...
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.02.14 21:09:00
|
79. [AUCTION] Dread Guristas weapons - in Sell Orders [original thread]
2) buyout 70mil
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.02.14 20:54:00
|
80. Question about pasive tanking - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Yes, according to this guide you are correct. The recharge rate drops after the 30% mark, but not a lot.
- by Dark PIne - at 2006.02.11 12:52:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |